HTS 2851, Comparative
Study of Religious Ethics, Trinity Lutheran Seminary, Spring Quarter 2007,
Dr. Paul D. Numrich,
emails pnumrich@mtso.edu
(primary) or
COURSE DESCRIPTION: An
introduction to the ethical systems of selected world religions (including
Christianity), with comparative analysis of one practical ethical issue (for
this quarter, “human health” broadly construed).
OBJECTIVES:
1. To introduce the
comparative study of religious ethics.
2. To explore how
selected world religions (and their sub-groups) approach practical ethical
issues.
3. To begin to
understand “religion” in comparative perspective.
4. To develop one’s own
perspective on non-Christian religions in preparation for faithful
participation in inter-religious encounters and informed leadership among
fellow Christians.
5. To enhance the
scholarly enterprise of the Theological Consortium.
TEXTBOOKS AND OTHER
Religious Traditions
and Health Care Decisions handbook series
(
M. Christian Green and Paul D. Numrich, Religious
Perspectives on Sexuality: A Resource Guide (
Other readings listed on
the assignment schedule and possible additions
Reading Assignments
James B. Martin-Schramm and Robert L. Stivers, Christian Environmental Ethics: A Case
Method Approach (Orbis, 2003), Chapters 2 and 3 [library reserve]
T.
Ninian Smart, Worldviews:
Crosscultural Explorations of Human Beliefs (Scribners, 1983), Chapter 6 [library
reserve for Introduction to World Religions course]
Green and Numrich pages on Roman Catholicism
“The Roman
Catholic Tradition” handbook
Green and Numrich pages on Moderate and Liberal
Protestantism
“The
Lutheran Tradition” handbook
Green and Numrich pages
on Judaism
“The Jewish Tradition” handbook
Green and Numrich pages
on Islam
“The Islamic Tradition” handbook
Green and Numrich pages
on Hinduism
“The Hindu Tradition” handbook
Green and Numrich pages
on Buddhism
“The Buddhist Tradition” handbook
Course conclusion
[I]t
seems to me that the purport of religion is to stress the spiritual
life—worship of God, a vision of the goodness of the world, the practice of
meditation, a perception of the impermanence of things, and so on. Morality has
to be related to such spiritual vision and life. It is true that the religions
do not agree by any means and their atmospheres often greatly differ. But they
still are like fingers pointing at the moon: they point to what lies Beyond.
This pointing to what lies beyond challenges the “worldly” notions of happiness
and welfare that often enter into the calculations of modern folk, in the
utilitarian tradition. True peace of spirit can (I would suggest, from a
religious angle) be achieved only if one is in relationship to what lies
Beyond. What is needed is transcendental
humanism: prizing human welfare but seeing it in the light of a vision of what
is eternal.
-- Ninian Smart, Worldviews, 3rd ed., 116-117